With 2013 Oscar season now behind us, I thought this was a good time to kick off “In a Movie Place.” I was thinking about how many great films were made during Hollywood’s so-called golden age of the studio era, the 1930s. I did a quick scan of the best picture nominees throughout that decade. I thought about how, in hindsight, some of the winners have not held up, while several of the also-rans are actually superior films that hold up remarkably well today.
One of those titles is “Dodsworth,” a 1936 best picture nominee. It started as a book by Sinclair Lewis, which was turned into a play by Sidney Howard, who then wrote the screenplay for director William Wyler’s film, produced by Samuel Goldwyn, no stranger to high-quality material.
About the plot. The film examines pre-war American morals, manners, and spirit through the character of Sam Dodsworth, the head of Dodsworth Motor Company, an automobile manufacturing firm headquartered in Zenith, Ohio. His wife Fran is a denizen of Zenith society, obsessed with remaining youthful despite the onset of middle age. She has distinct aspirations for what she considers the better things in life. While very wealthy, Fran still feels frustrated and unfulfilled living in this small Ohio town and wants more excitement. Meanwhile, Sam is at a crossroads in his life, having achieved most everything he ever set out to do. Fran capitalizes on his discontent by convincing him to sell his interest in the company and take a voyage on the Queen Mary bound for England and Paris.
But the cruise has unintended ramifications, as Fran’s own discontent manifests itself in flirtations with various men aboard ship. While Sam views Fran as merely stretching her wings a little, he meets a sympathetic divorcee named Edith Cortright, with whom he develops a friendship. Arriving in Paris, the Dodsworths begin a social whirl, during which Fran’s flirtations develop into an adulterous romance with a nobleman. Fran, tired of Sam, insists that they separate. A brief reconciliation leads to a decision to divorce. However, at the climax of the film, Fran learns that the nobleman cannot marry her after all; desperate, she tries to convince Sam to take her back. But he has had enough, and in a dramatic finish, he leaves Fran on a cruise liner bound for the states for the kind-hearted Edith who, through the course of the film, revealed her own feelings for Sam.
My assessment. It may sound like soap opera, but this is really an expert examination of the dissolution of a marriage and an epiphany, the reawakening of a particular man. The film is unique for the 1930s in that it is really an examination of Sam’s inner life; we get to see him reevaluate how far he has come in life in terms of his success, as he begins to yearn for something he can’t quite define. (As it turns out, that yearning is for someone who loves him not for what he can buy, but for who he is.)
Walter Huston |
Outside of a dramatic (and cathartic) climax, there really aren’t any overblown dramatics in the film; rather, the dialogue feels very true. The scene between Sam and Fran in their hotel room as they bicker while getting ready for bed is a great example. The scene in which Sam confronts Fran’s new paramour—and her subsequent defensiveness—is another. It’s here where Sam says slyly, “Have you ever noticed how transparent people are when you really look at them?”
I think the success of the film over many other Best Picture nominees (and winners) of that decade is that it still tells us something about ourselves. As Americans, we still have the mentality to work hard, achieve the best, strive for more, always fit society’s standard of success. Yet, like Sam, some of us reach a point where we realize there must be something else to life.
About the actors. By today’s standards, Walter Huston’s portrayal of Sam may come across as bombastic at times, but at that time he was considered one of the best actors of the stage and screen, someone who could do anything. (BTW, he's the father of John Huston and grandfather of Anjelica Huston.) I think his gruffness is spot-on. It characterizes a smart, yet plain-talking man from humble roots who has made good for himself in a capitalist society, someone who believed in his God-given right and ability to make a name for himself.
Ruth Chatterton |
In contrast to Chatterton, Mary Astor, as Edith, seems very real and grounded. She creates a warm characterization of an independent woman who is not the least bit concerned about making a big impression on anybody. She is smart and self-aware, and her scenes opposite Chatterton’s self-absorbed, shallow Fran underscore these traits. In fact, in any scene in which Fran and Edith interact, you immediately know who the real sophisticate is, who the real lady is. And they have a couple of great moments together. (Astor's career lasted much longer than Chatterton's, and she proved herself consistently as a versatile actress adept at heavy drama, action adventure, film noir, and screwball comedy. She has several big-time classics in her filmography, the best known being the femme fatale in Walter's son John's 1941 masterpiece, "The Maltese Falcon.")
Mary Astor |
About the look and feel. The film does a terrific job of capturing the look of the 1930s, from the streamlined manufacturing plant to the plush coziness of the Dodsworth’s Zenith home; from the art deco design of the ship to the extravagance of old Europe. Not to mention the casual airiness of Edith's Italian villa, the scene of a turning point in the film.
Speaking of the ship, it’s important to remember that "Dodsworth" was made when ocean liners were still a major mode of transportation. The movie surely conveys the glamour and romanticism of ocean travel in a visual way that the book and play could not. (And it makes you want to go back in time and take the Dodsworth’s journey, as long as you can look as good in a deck chair as Mary Astor does!)
The film’s look and tone feel very rooted in the 1930s, but because it’s so well done across the board—from the writing to the acting and directing to the impeccable costumes and set design—and because it deals with substantial themes, I feel that "Dodworth" rises above the other nominees (and the winner) for its year. A classic is a film that feels timeless, and, to me, “Dodsworth” does. Taking stock, seeing how far one has come and the prices paid, asking, “How did I get here? Is this what I wanted?” are themes that resonate regardless of time period, and that’s why the movie is so special.
The film is available on DVD and runs pretty regularly on Turner Classic Movies.
No comments:
Post a Comment